Archive for October 26th, 2009

[socialist.net] A trade unionist, not a terrorist

Monday, October 26th, 2009
As previously reported, on 21st October Steve Acheson appeared at the Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand, central London. He was there because Scottish and Southern Energy, the owners of Fiddlers…

More…

Anyone for Europe?

Monday, October 26th, 2009
i am planning to go through europe with about 40 pounds in my pocket, reason being, i want to travel through a slum in each country along the way and interview locals for a book i am writing called ;
"first world slums"

The main places i want to go are

france
italy
Northern I

i can not speak french or spanish:(, so i have been looking for someone who wants to go to europe, this way i have a touring buddy and a translator.
My mates are all single language souls, so i thought i would ask on here.
Would prefer a beautifull smart funny woman, but i dont hold out much hope.

[socialist-alliance.org] Trade unionists show the way against Rudd’s inhumanity towar

Monday, October 26th, 2009
Three leading trade unionists - Dave Noonan, national secretary of the construction division of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Paul Howes, national secretary of the Australian Workers Union, and Tim Gooden, secretary of the Geelong Trades Hall Council - have spoken out against the Rudd government’s callous line on asylum-seekers. </p>
They are showing the way in the ongoing struggle for a humane refugee policy, against the bipartisan war between Labor and the Coalit …

More…

[socialist-alliance.org] Make public transport free and people will make the switch

Monday, October 26th, 2009
>Wollongong free shuttle bus shows: Make public transport free and people will make the switch

Monday October 26, 2009 - The success of the free shuttle bus in Wollongong has stirred the Socialist Alliance to renew calls for public transport to be made free across the state of NSW.

Illawarra Socialist Alliance convener, Chris Williams, said: ‘Wollongong’s free shuttle bus has been used over 1 million times now - an amazing uptake. It proves that when public transport is …

More…

[anarkismo.net] Global Solidarity for Abahlali baseMjondolo

Monday, October 26th, 2009
A list of articles and statements in the wake of the attacks on Abahlali baseMjondolo by a state backed ANC militia
On 28 September 2009 the Kennedy Road commune, one of 14 shack settlements in Durban governed autonomously and democratically by Abahlali baseMjondolo was attacked by a militia chanting fascist slogans against non-Zulus. Their stated aim was to kill Abahlali baseMjondolo leader S’bu Zikode.

There was spontaneous resistance to the militia and after a 23 hour battle they were decisively routed. The police then stepped in and arrested key AbM leaders while, under police protection, the militia systematically destroyed the homes of more than 30 Abahlali leaders. Local ANC leaders from outside of the settlement then took control of it with full backing of the police and senior politicians.

Attacks, death threats and have now spread to nearby settlements and it is crystal clear that there is a major state backed attack on the largest poor people’s movement in Africa.

Attacks and threats have

More…

[anarchistnews.org] Anarchism and the Politics of Technology

Monday, October 26th, 2009
From WorkingUSA - by Uri Gordon</p> Published in WorkingUSA: The Journal of Labor and Society.

Contemporary anarchists’ practical attitudes toward technology seem highly ambivalent, even contradictory. Our proverbial antiauthoritarian could pull up genetically modified crops before dawn, report on the action through e-mail lists and websites in the morning, fix her or his community’s wind-powered generator in the afternoon, and work part-time as a programmer after supper. Thus, on the one hand, we find anarchists involved in numerous campaigns and direct actions where the introduction of new technologies is explicitly resisted, from bio- and nanotechnology to technologies of surveillance and warfare. On the other hand, anarchists have been actively using and developing information and communication technologies (ICTs), as well as engaging in practical sustainability initiatives that involve their own forms of technological innovation.

To briefly survey the field: resistance to new technologies was prominent on both sides of the Atlantic from the 1970s on, in the activities of the antinuclear and radical environmental movements—both important progenitors of contemporary anarchist networks (Epstein 1993; Wall 1999; Seel, Patterson, and Doherty 2000; Gordon 2007). Experimental growing of genetically modified crops was also met with widespread resistance, primarily in Western Europe, with anarchist groups often taking the lead (SchNEWS 2004; Thomas 2001). More recently, there has been active anarchist involvement in campaigning against the introduction of biometric identification cards in the UK (Anarchist Federation 2008a), against bogus “techno-fixes” to climate change such as geo-engineering and carbon capture and sequestration (Fauset 2008), and against the emergent industrial strategy of technological convergence on the nano scale (ETC Group 2003; Plows and Reinsborough 2008). Anarchist action repertoires can thus safely be said to contain a strong antitechnological element. read more

More…

[anarchistnews.org] New riot porn blog

Monday, October 26th, 2009
Miss Riot Porn Blog, Bombs and Shields, Social Rupture? We do. Where’d all that shit go anyway?</p> In the tradition of anarchist direct action, we have decided to meet our needs directly by creating a new website dedicated to compiling images and brief reports on the many amazing collective actions undertaken, seemingly at least once every few days somewhere in the world, by people defending their homes, burning their prisons, expropriating their means of existence, fucking the police, or just generally raging against the machine. We will not be covering riots about religion and sports (OMGWTF!), but will definitely include any particularly large, violent, and/or otherwise impressive strikes, occupations, blockades, protests, proletarian self-valorization through the negation of capital, or any other militantly desubjectivizing collective activity.

The subtext here is for folks in the U.S. to step it up. The last great depression in the U.S. was met by organized looting on a mass scale as well as violent as fuck labor disputes. This time around we expect a revitalized squatters movement and confrontations with fascists to be a part of the mix. read more

More…

[anarchistnews.org] To all friends and supporters of GPAC: A communique from a cold n

Monday, October 26th, 2009
OUR CURRENT SITUATION - October 2009</p> Recently, GPAC has received a notice from the building owners to vacate our social space at 5001 Penn Avenue in the neighborhood of Garfield by January 1, 2010. Since buying the building in 2006, the owners expressed interest in opening a community center, but the storefront sat empty until we approached them in 2008. To fulfill our desires for a space to allow the opportunities for struggle to multiply, we made a verbal agreement with the owners to pay a portion of utilities and property taxes, and to put our time and labor into fixing up the 1st floor. We put up walls, fixed the floor, painted, fixed plumbing, cleaned, and obtained appliances and furniture from October 2008 to April 17, 2009. We did this work while our lives were filled with the usual stress and tumult that the current society offers, along with additional discouragement from the owners. Our hope and resilience lies in the warm support of our old friends, allies and friends to be, which we hope to have in this struggle for space.

Despite our willingness to work with the owners, they violate our agreement and our autonomy. They modify the agreement at their discretion, informally. We entered into a relationship with the owners with the understanding that we had similar goals, as we and the owners shared time at Project 1877, our old Garfield-based social center that closed in 2003. They use their class power against us by reminding us constantly that they are able to evict us at any time, sell the building to make money, make use of the privileges of mobility, and that they know what’s best for Garfield. The present paternalistic situation is much more restrictive than a typical landlord-tenant relationship in that they will not sign a lease with us and are willing to take steps to ensure that we are out of the building even after they sell it. They are property owners who choose to use their access to developers, lawyers, and police. Their power over us has been evident in their connections, attitudes, and selfish value system. They communicate with us at times that are convenient for them, sometimes confrontationally, cornering individuals with no advanced notice, rather than initiating communication with the entire group as requested. This is contrary to the way our non-hierarchical group process works. read more

More…

[IMC Global] Movilización en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires

Monday, October 26th, 2009
More…

Why Extremist Views Dominate

Monday, October 26th, 2009
For many people — more than you might think — public and political dialogue seems dominated by extreme views that don’t resonate.
A new study suggests a possible reason: People with extreme views seem more willing to share their opinions than others, but only if they believe, even falsely, that their views are popular.

However, the research looked at only a narrow topic range and involved just college students, so more study would be needed to reveal whether the findings apply broadly to other age groups and beliefs.
Still, the findings are intriguing.

The upshot of the research: Students who held extreme views on the use of alcohol on campus were more likely than others to voice their views. The key to their bold approach, scientists found, was that they tended to believe their views actually represented a majority, when that was not in fact the case.

That situation can set up a self-feeding cycle that promotes the voicing of extreme views on one side of an issue and causes moderate and even extremists on the other side to stay relatively quiet.
"When people with extreme views have this false sense that they are in the majority, they are more willing to express themselves," said Kimberly Rios Morrison, co-author of the study and assistant professor of communication at Ohio State University. Those who take the extreme version of their group’s viewpoint may believe that they actually represent the true views of their group, Morrison figures.

The studies
In a series of studies, Morrison and her co-author, Dale Miller of Stanford University, found that college students who were extremely pro-alcohol were more likely to express their opinions than others, even though most students surveyed were moderate in their views about alcohol use.
"Students who were stridently pro-alcohol tended to think that their opinion was much more popular than it actually was," she said. "They seemed to buy into the stereotype that college students are very comfortable with alcohol use."

The results were detailed recently in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

The studies were done at Stanford, where alcohol use is prohibited in common areas of all freshman dorms. In the first study, 37 students were asked to rate their own views about this policy on a scale from 1 (very strongly opposed) to 9 (very strongly in favor).
The average students’ own views were near the mid-point of the scale, but most rated the typical Stanford student as more pro-alcohol than themselves.

"There’s this stereotype that college students are very pro-alcohol, and even most college students believe it," Morrison said. "Most students think of themselves as less pro-alcohol than average."
In the next two studies, students again rated themselves on similar scales that revealed how pro-alcohol they were. They were then asked how willing they would be to discuss their views on alcohol use with other Stanford students.

In general, students who were the most pro-alcohol were the most likely to say they wanted to express their views, compared to those with moderate or anti-alcohol views.

A telling twist
Then researchers added a twist, giving participants fake data that indicated that other Stanford students held relatively conservative, anti-alcohol views. When extremely pro-alcohol students viewed this data, they were less likely to say they were willing to discuss alcohol usage with their fellow students.
"It is only when they have this sense that they are in the majority that extremely pro-alcohol students are more willing to express their views on the issue," Morrison said.

Interestingly, however, students who had more extreme anti-alcohol views still did not desire to express them, even after seeing the data that suggested a majority of their fellow students agreed with them.
"Their views that they are in the minority may be so deeply entrenched that it is difficult to change just based on our one experiment," Morrison said. "In addition, they don’t have the experience expressing their opinions on the subject like the pro-alcohol extremists do, so they may not feel as comfortable."

The findings suggest possible parallels in politics, Morison figures.
She cites a hypothetical community that tends to be moderate politically, but leans slightly liberal. People with more extreme liberal views in the community may be more likely than others to attend publicly visible protests and display bumper stickers espousing their liberal views, because they think the community supports them.

A self-feeding cycle might ensue.
"Everyone else sees these extreme opinions being expressed on a regular basis and they may eventually come to believe their community is more liberal than it actually is," Morrison said. "The same process could occur in moderately conservative communities.

http://www.livescience.com/culture/0…ist-views.html